View our mobile site
Editorial Columns Letters

Are you concerned about the impending changes to the persons with disabilities budget?

Yes, it's troublesome
60%
No, I'm sure the government knows what it's doing
20%
Unsure, I haven't been paying attention to the issue
20%

View past polls

twitter

Splash park sparks talk

Aug 28, 2012 01:31 pm | Janice Huser

When talk began of creating a splash park in St. Paul, I think most parents were quite happy to hear this news and the majority of people, I believe, are in favour of creating this recreational opportunity in town.

Last week, a Facebook page was created, encouraging people to put their name on a petition to have the park located at Lagasse Park, rather than other proposed locations.

The morning after I was added to the page, I woke up with over 100 notifications in my email. I was rather surprised so many people felt drawn to take part in this conversation, whether it was by simply stating the two words “Lagasse Park” or by offering longer comments and their thoughts for or against the placement of the splash park at this location.

I quickly realized, after taking some time to sift through my emails, that there are a few misconceptions regarding this proposed spray park. The biggest misconception is that people believe the Town of St. Paul is creating this park, when in reality, a group of non-profit organizations are spearheading this project. I believe these groups, the St. Paul and District Lions Club, the local Elks lodge, and St. Paul Abilities Network, deserve recognition for initiating this project.

The town is facilitating the project and will offer land, and has also agreed to give as much as $60,000, if needed. Town representatives have confirmed this in the past and in more recent discussions also.

I know there will be a variety of items that will be looked at before the final decision is made regarding the location of the park, and I hope the decision isn’t made lightly, but instead thoughtfully.

Lagasse Park is one of the potential locations, and a quick look over the Facebook page that was created last week shows a lot of support for this location. It also shows that there is support for other locations, such as placing the park near the soccer fields.

I was confused by the term “soccer fields” at first, and have since clarified that the location would (thankfully) be much closer to the campsite, not the soccer fields. I think it would be totally absurd to place a spray park near the soccer fields. As a parent with a child who plays soccer, it’s already quite the affair to convince him to play soccer, rather than wanting to go to the playground that is already near Reunion Station. Putting a spray park anywhere within sight of the soccer fields would cause even more frustration for parents of young soccer players.

The campground also has obvious issues, such as accessibility. Children would not be able to walk to a splash park if it was located off a busy highway, away from residential homes. Even pushing a stroller with children would be a challenge in this location. It might be convenient for some visitors passing through to have a spray park nearby, but I can’t see how it would benefit local residents who would be using the park numerous times throughout the year.

And of course, Lagasse Park also has issues. Many people have voiced concern over the smell that comes from the lake and the bugs, which are worst in spring. Although I have certainly smelled the lake, I bring my kids to the playgrounds at Lagasse sometimes and they always seem to enjoy the park atmosphere, and have never said anything about the smell or the bugs.

With the online discussions that went on about the placement of the spray park, it made me wonder if maybe neither location was the right one. I’m unsure of where else the park could go, since it does depend on the availability of water, and other infrastructure factors, but I hope there is a spot on which residents can agree.

The project is one that was initiated by community members who only want to improve the town, and I certainly hope this project will continue as such. And when it is complete, I hope it acts as a reminder to people that good things are possible when good people work together.

Comments

Mary Blundon said:
I was thinking that the splash park would do well if it was adjoining to the St. Paul Aquatic Centre, there would be many benefits for them both. They could both help in the planning process, using it first as an outdoor park and in the future close it in for year-round usage with the Aquatic Centre being the main entrance. The Aquatic Centre could also preplan an expansion of the fitness area when they do go to close it in. Done in two stages it would be more affordable for both parties, the township could set money aside each year and the other committee could continue to fundraise, until they have enough for the second stage. Aquatic Centre has everything they made need already in place like a proper water source, generators, bathrooms, lifeguards & staff to help keep an eye on things, knowledge in proper maintenance, ample parking and accessibility for anyone, and should not bother anyone who is living near that location. They could help fund, support, and promote each other in ways that may not have been possible otherwise.
Just a Thought,
Mary B.
September 3, 2012 @ 1:01 pm Report Abuse
Forums message number 334731 has been flagged as offensive by a user.

Category:
Category 2:
Category 3:
message ID: 334731
Post On: September 3, 2012
Posted by User #: Mary Blundon
Posted by IP:

message:
I was thinking that the splash park would do well if it was adjoining to the St. Paul Aquatic Centre, there would be many benefits for them both. They could both help in the planning process, using it first as an outdoor park and in the future close it in for year-round usage with the Aquatic Centre being the main entrance. The Aquatic Centre could also preplan an expansion of the fitness area when they do go to close it in. Done in two stages it would be more affordable for both parties, the township could set money aside each year and the other committee could continue to fundraise, until they have enough for the second stage. Aquatic Centre has everything they made need already in place like a proper water source, generators, bathrooms, lifeguards & staff to help keep an eye on things, knowledge in proper maintenance, ample parking and accessibility for anyone, and should not bother anyone who is living near that location. They could help fund, support, and promote each other in ways that may not have been possible otherwise.
Just a Thought,
Mary B.
   

Got something to say?

Post Comment

You haven't entered any comments to post!

The St. Paul Journal welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

In order to post comments on our web site, you must validate your email address. An email was sent to you when you registered that included an activation link. If you have not yet done so, please click on the link to activate your account.

If you did not receive your activation email, please click here to have it resent.

In order to post comments, you must be logged in.

Already a member? Login here!

Not yet a member of the site? Register here!

Community Events Rss icon

June 2013
Thursday
20
S M T W T F S
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456